The human standard of morality has truly been aldulterated by religion, if anything. Religion always come down to a sense of us vs them, and of course us are always better than them, so you can treat them badly and immorally. Everything becomes a subjective, unsubstantiated opinion. If this is the best morals god can offer then my grandmother can do a better job then him. Inquisition, Crusades, treatment of American natives by the European governments. Many people think it is outrageous, or even blasphemous, to deny that morality is of divine origin. If one could commit murder and know 100% that there is no negative consequence to them but only positive then without some sort of supreme being that gave them the rule of morality it makes no sense to not commit that murder. Also, if you can, kudos to those who can provide an article or something. But there is no scientific proof that the rock felt like it should fall. Either some divine being crafted our moral sense during the period of creation or we picked it up from the teachings of organized religion. There are two interesting philosophical questions here. Morality is objective because you can objectively assess the consequences of your actions and tell how they tend towards pleasure, life, health etc rather than the opposite. When one breaks that down to the level of the individual is where it unravels. By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies. At the societal level it makes sense that not murdering (or being murdered) is a good thing and thus can be explained as a social construct. 5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG. The teachings of Christ provide a moral framework that we can use to objectively measure the morality of our thoughts and actions. At the historical level, a way to explore the question of how the rise of religions with Big Gods transformed morality is proposed. So, from a religious or, more specifically, Christian point of view, why do you think religion is necessary for morality? As a possible Hilbert question in the scientific study of religion, this article tries to explicate one specific relation between religion and morality: whether religion is necessary for morality. There are many religious people I met who are good and many I met who were bad, the same goes for atheism. 3099067 I think I felt better to after that for some reason. The article operationalizes morality as normative and meta-ethical judgments and tries to specify ways to answer the question at … As a possible Hilbert question in the scientific study of religion, this article tries to explicate one specific relation between religion and morality: whether religion is necessary for morality. 2020-02-25. But whether you're a good or bad person is unaffected by your religion. It is because of specific policies. These include the Triple Gems of Jainism, Islam's Sharia, Catholicism's Canon Law, Buddhism's Eightfold Path, and Zoroastrianism's"good thoughts, good words, and good deeds" concept, among others. Both views see the same endpoint: we need religion to curb nature ’s vices. I don't have time to talk or think about something that may or may not exist. A logical argument proves that the opposite is true; there are 2.5 billion non-religious people on Earth, can a strong argument be made to suggest these individuals are immoral? Yes, you need religion for morality, because without an objective moral standard, there is no way to tell what is right and wrong. The majority of my family believe in the "creator", but I found it to be unnecessary. Nietzsche questions if morality is even necessary. As a matter of fact religion, in too many ways, leads to immorality. Compare the atrocities of mankind towards itself and the earth, via religious and/or political motivations, to that of the animal kingdom and ask yourself who holds the higher moral standard, and who is less religious?To merely state that religion is required for morality is an argument of semantics, not logic. At the ontogenetic level, the effect of religious training in childhood and a shift to non-belief in adulthood on morality is explored. This is not something science can measure as science handles "what has happened" not "what should happen". Religion can obviously affect even those who say they don't need it. To day a rock falls when dropped from the air is only saying what is happening. In October 2019 Attorney General William Barr gave a speech at the University of Notre Dame in which he claimed that religion is essential for morality. stitutions can serve social monitoring functions; therefore religion is not necessary for morality. Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard law professor, believed that "morality can be maintained without religion." The article operationalizes morality as normative and meta-ethical judgments and tries to specify ways to answer the question at three different levels: phylogenetic, historical, and ontogenetic. Christian societies and cultures would later use the bible in forming their moral code. I am having difficulty finding any articles discussing why religion is necessary to develop morality. I understand that all things being equal, pleasure is better than pain, life is better than death, health is better than illness. Don't get me wrong, I'm not anti-religion. Morality and Religion Debate In an organized religion debate, Alan Dershowitz and Alan Keyes contended many issues on religion and morality. That can be from a religion, but it does not have to be. Many religions have value frameworks regarding personal behavior meant to guide adherents in determining between right and wrong. Register to receive personalised research and resources by email, Department of Psychology, Dogus University, Acibadem, Istanbul, Turkey, /doi/full/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1249924?needAccess=true, : Hilbert Problems in the Scientific Study of Religion. Our children and our childrens' children would still be affected by this even if in the future religion is no more. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. Though some people may use religion as an excuse to do good or bad things. Religion and morality cannot be separated. I do not see my relationship with God through Jesus Christ a 'religion' It is NOT a set of rules to follow or else - it is a relationship, a living relationship with the One who made the Universe, the Earth, and all of us...We only have subjective morality in society because of mans refusal to come to Christ to be saved - no one wants the results of sin, but are all happy to participate in it - but a relationship with God is absolutely necessary to live the right way..... Nietzsche's argument that "god is dead" has been highly misinterpreted.